Shutterstock has signed on to test out Rarify’s tech, and Oringer wrote Tsivtsivadze the first check for Rarify, part of a $3 million seed round last year that included Greycroft and Einac Ventures.įour of Rarify’s 14 employees, including the chief technology officer and engineering head, remain in Ukraine, where they had been living before the Russian invasion. Revas Tsivtsivadze spent 5 years as a product manager at Shutterstock, winning the attention of its billionaire founder, Jon Oringer, by the time he left in 2021.
Rarify blog software#
What if we could cut down on that from 14 steps in the process to three steps.” Further, in the future, Rarify thinks it might be able to build some type of investment software to gauge the investment value of NFTs, which remain a volatile and unregulated asset class. “Checking out on OpenSea,” currently the largest NFT exchange, “is like, a 14-step process. The goal is something along the lines of “how Square made it super easy to accept payments,” says cofounder Revas Tsivtsivadze. Rather, it plans to sell software to big corporations that make creating and selling NFTs easier. Pantera likes that Rarify is doing something more straightforward than a token-based members’ club.
Rarify blog series#
send to the rest of the world when we endorse and support young activists like Malala Yousafzai, and her platform for girls’ rights to education, when the U.S.Rarify, a new NFT startup has raised a $10 million Series A at $100 million valuations from Pantera Capital, one of the earliest venture capital firms to focus on crypto.
Rarify blog how to#
The United States can learn from other member nations on how to reduce poverty, ensure women’s rights, improve education and educational access, and healthy living conditions, for starters. Ensuring paid parental leave, access to pre- and post-natal health care for women has been linked to better health outcomes for children and parents. Ending discrimination against children is ending discrimination against people. Protections of children with disabilities are protections for people with disabilities. The currently all male-staff (Farris says the group has never focused on maternal leave as an issue) of and other opponents of the CRC overlook that protections for the rights of children are human rights. American children and families are better served by constitutional democracy than international law.” The group fears that ratifying the treaty would mean children could choose their own religion, that children would have a legally enforceable right to leisure, that nations would have to spend more on children’s welfare than national defense, and that a child’s “right to be heard” could trigger a governmental review of any decision a parent made that a child didn’t like. Upon ratification, this nation would be making a binding promise in international law that we would obey the legal standards created by the U.N. “Our constitutional system gives the exclusive authority for the creation of law and policy on issues about families and children to state governments. “The chief threat posed by the CRC is the denial of American self-government in accord with our constitutional processes,” said Farris in an email interview. ratification of “dangerous U.N conventions that “threaten parental rights” such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Farris, is a constitutional lawyer and president of, an organization that has been actively campaigning against U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
